Ltd., holds thatdisclosing additional incomefor each assessment year covered by the application, not mandatory;Explains that the intention of the applicant before ITSC is to the casesettled’, remarks thatthe ‘case’may involve assessment years for which additional income is disclosed for some years and no additional income is disclosed for the remaining years;Further, ITSC SB observes that “The substantive provision 245C(1) (relating to ‘application’ before ITSC) shows that since the time of decision in the case of Airtech Private Ltd., it has remained almost the same and hence there is no necessity to ignore this decision. 2007 and 2010 have not affected the legal position”;Accordingly, ITSC SB holds that the principle laid down inAirtech ruling, though rendered in 1994,continues to hold good; Further holds that there is no requirement that in each year where the additional income has been disclosed there should be additional tax payable, so long as the threshold limit of tax as provided in 245C(1) is exceeded; However out of 7 Members, F. M.
I just hope the management listens. But as an American and long time Brooks Brothers shopper, I am delighted that M is selling off Brooks Brothers. Since buying this icon of traditional American dress, M has reinvented it as a fashion conscious clothier.
Same on TV and in the movies. It’s only negatives and stereotypes. It’s like Trump, keep repeating lies over and over and eventually people believe them. Toenail fungus is more common than fingernail fungus. There are several reasons why this is the case. For one thing, the toes are usually encased in shoes ad/or socks, so they often stay damp for long periods of time.
A momentum cross where there was no momentum? Then doing the straight into a behind the back that shoots you across the court? That not a built in ability. That an exploit that 2K doesn fix because they focus on the next year game far too early.don over complicate it and talk about how it would never occur in real life or debate the physics because it a video gameWhy not debate physics and realism if that the aim of the game? You ever read the back of the case? Here some direct quotes from the packaging of two games:2K18 “The new motion system brings player control to a new level of realism”2K17 Let just go with the literal tagline in big ass font “THIS IS NOT A GAME”2K14 “2K ground breaking, dynamic gameplay engine marries real life physics, player emotion and deep controls to deliver a seemingly endless variation of actions and reactions that can only be achieved with next generation technology”The game wants the user to experience real life physics so why not expect that? If I order pancakes, should I expect waffles? If I pay for Coke, should I be okay for with a Gatorade? If ya girl pees on you and says “it only rain,” should you just be alright with that? (I reaching with the last one). You get my point.we could sit here for hours and pick things out of 2k that couldn occur in real lifeYes.